By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Einsam_Delphin said:
Nautilus said:

No dammit.I disagree with you in the sense that they should reveal all of their cards, or most of them.The NEED to hold off big games, like Animal Crossing or Metroid for example for other events like E3.But they could have used a bit more games for the reveal, like the game intelligent systems is developing.

The point Im trying to make is that Nintendo needs to keep the momentum going, and if the burn themselves by making a big splasch now but having nothing to show for the next year, it will be bad for them.

But I never said all, and most still means they have stuff left. Sooner is more important than later, because the Switch's support from both Nintendo and third partys depends on it's initial sales performance, so it is smarter to reveal stuff asap. Don't want another Wii U situation where it was too late to be saved and third partys n Nintendo quickly gave up on it. 

The bold is you agreeing with me again. :L

I think we are misunderstanding each other.The part we are disagreeing with is the ammount they should have announced.I am thinking they should have announced a bit more, and you say they should have announced much more.I personally think they have hit a good balance, assuming they have a bit more third party titles to fill the blanks, like sonic mania, sonic 2017, Dragon Quest X and XI, and so on.(This is shaping up to be one hell of an RPG machine, but I digress)

All in all, I think we can agree that at the very least Nintendo left us interested to see more about the system.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1