Goodnightmoon said:
TheGreatOther said:
It had some good exclusives sure, but you need more than that, ultimately it's about the overall library not just a bunch of exclusives.
An here's the problem Wii had, look at the top 10 highest rated IPs of last generation:
Super Mario Galaxy
Grand Theft Auto
Uncharted
Bioshock
The Last of Us
Mass Effect
Batman
The Elder Scrolls
LittleBigPlanet
Red Dead Redemption
Out of those the number available on each console:
Wii: 1
360: 6
PS3: 9
If you go down the list and get into top 20, or top 50, or top 100 Wii still runs into this similar problem.
The library of Wii is objectively bad unless you're a hardcore Nintendo fan.
|
Objectively bad my ass, half of the games on that list don't deserve to be there to begging with, Metacritic is not God, look the shitty MGSV with a 95 on XBO, that's"Objective"? lol
Mario Galaxy 1, Mario galaxy 2 and Xenoblade Chronicles are already 3 of the best games ever made and you don't need to be a fucking Nintendo fan to see it, only a gamer with criteria.
Also, is lovely how you choose to forget than Twilight Princess should be on that list too as it has the same exact score as half of the includd games, very "objective"...
|
You can't objectively say a game is good or bad... but Metacritic does lend some credibility to subjective claims. So while you're allowed to say something like MGSV is shitty, I'm sure you would be upset to know that I consider both Galaxy games to also be pretty shitty (Mario on King Kai's planet- yay).
But would I still count them as good games in an argument like this? Yes, because I clearly have the unpopular opinion. Likewise, saying MGSV is shitty is fine, but it's still a top tier AAA game.
