Einsam_Delphin said:
Soundwave said:
These games didn't sell though, and I hate to say it, but it'll probably be the same story on Switch. People bitched and moaned about a lot of the those games have just very superficial differences like a moderate difference in frame rate .... Switch ports of anything from PS4/XB1 are going to be far more compromised.
Nintendo fans don't buy these games, that's kinda the elephant in the room no one wants to talk about either. They're happy just buying Mario/Pokemon/Zelda/DK etc. etc. Even Nintendo has problems selling quality games like Bayonetta and Xenoblade in any real large numbers.
Nintendo allowed too many of the consumers from its fanbase that would buy a wider variety of content to leave to Sony/MS' a long time ago.
|
So wait, if you acknowledge that third party games don't sell on Nintendo, why are you teling me you want Nintendo to pay for third party games? =/
|
I'm saying if they are a hardware maker they have some minimum responsibility to ensure there some variety of content in the most basic areas, whether they like it or not, and yes even if it sells big or not.
If they can't invest into their own platform, how can they ever expect a developer or consumer to. Besides, really what would be the cost for Nintendo paying for yearly updates to sports games? Like peanuts? You update the rosters, add a few new features, it's not rocket science.
