Gourmet said:
Yo right kiddo, never say wikipedia is your source, but someone who calls himself scientist? Pfft, that shure is enough for you to get that awesome grade! |
Stop putting words in my mouth. Personally I love wikipedia. It's great! If you know how to use it that is. And that is to be critical. Anyone can write that shit.
I would however generaly trust scientists though. Because while I'm only 99% sure wikipedia is written by someone who's not my neighbour I'm 100% certain the scientist isn't.
But no matter, wikipedia is actually siting these fine scientist of ours! Who needs to choose between the two then eh? :D
"Scientific understanding of global warming is increasing. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reported in 2014 that scientists were more than 95% certain that global warming is mostly being caused by human (anthropogenic) activities, "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming
How about that eh? ^_^
Nevertheless, I'm noticing you are jumping right over all that I said in my first post. Have you got anything to repute what I said? Wikipedia to back it up maybe, since that seems like your go to source? Once again, I don't mind since they are siting correct information on this.







