Soundwave on 15 December 2016
My view on this is simple. Until we have two habitable planets to live on, maybe we should err on the side of caution?
Or does that make too much fucking sense?
Because it seems me there are two outcomes here
1.) If global warming scientists are wrong ... we'll have developed a bunch of efficient non-fossil fuel technology. Oil and coal corporations will suffer a bit, but still make huge profits.
2.) If global warming deniers are wrong ... humanity is in trouble and hundreds of millions of people will displaced and many more may die, Northern Europe, coastal US/Canada, Japan, etc. are in big trouble.
