barneystinson69 said:
Teeqoz said:
But his 51k number was basically conjured out of thin air. Stats don't work like that. I've already stated in this thread, the total number difference between #1 and #10 will in all likelihood be way bigger than the difference between #10 and #20. You can just take the difference between #1 and #20, divide it by 20, and say "okay, the decrease per spot on the list is 3.7k -> Halo 5's player population is 51k.". If you need a reference to see how off that logic will be, take a look at Steam's player count list:
http://store.steampowered.com/stats/
If we apply the same logic as was done in this thread we get this result:
"Okay, Terraria at #20 has a population of 17622. Dota 2 has a population of 344961. 344961-17622=327339, 327339/20=16367. Okay, so each spot down the list, the player count decreases by 16367. That means #10 has a population of..... (hm... 344961-16367*10=181291...) 181291 players! Goddamn!"
Meanwhile, the actual player count for #10 is 26242, which is waaaaaay less than what we got using this thread's logic. My point is that this logic just doesn't work, and will massively inflate the numbers.
|
As I've already stated, speculation. If we had population counts for a few games in between, it could be easier to get numbers. I just wish Halo 5 had a straight up population counter for all its playlists added up.
|
Yes but in the post I quoted it seemed like he interpretted the 51k to be "basically correct". Hence I provided a (this time more detailed) explanation of why this number is so unreliable it's not even funny.