By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Fairly simple answer.

The game patch for the upgraded res/fps etc, costs $5, per game, and stays at that price for good. If you can spend the extra cash on the better console, you can spend the extra on the games as well. Now the devs have all the reason in the world to make a low and med/high setting to fit everyones needs.

If you don't have enough extra to spend $5 on the patch, then you need a serious wake up call and attitude adjustment, period. Its like trading in your sports car for the new model, and getting the upgraded engine package at the same time. Well when you find out the oil they use is the same generic stuff, to bad so sad. You want the better oil, you can pay for that upgrade. You want the better washer fluid that will never ever freeze, pay for the upgrade. The average person don't need those fancy extra's and doesn't want to pay for them and shouldn't have to.

There is also always the option that all the rich gamers can subsidize the poor gamers so everyone can upgrade. While that would solve the problem as well, thats never gunna happen.



PS1   - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.

PS2  - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.

PS3   - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.

PS4   - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.

PRO  -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.

PS5   - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.

PRO  -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.