Darwinianevolution said:
Well, Hyrule Warriors was a pretty great success for both Nintendo and Tecmo Koei (I don't know how well SMTxFE did). Whether Nintendo invested funds in HW or not, the game did a pretty decent profit for a medium-tier game, and we'll probably see a sequel to it on the Switch. My point is, even if Nintendo has to somewhat invest in funds on a Nintendo Lego game (which it wouldn't be that much money, even if fully funded, which I doubt Nintendo would allow), the game would still sell well enough to grant a profit for both parts. Nintendo games sell well, Lego games sell well, so the crossover wouldn't be a flop, at least. Like I said, a Nintendo Lego game is a pretty safe bet. |
So what if say the Mario Lego game is a success then? So now we get a new game with Mario in it every few years instead of making something new.
It just seems like you want Nintendo to have exclusives just to have them. What person who isnt interested in Mario games will buy a Switch to play Lego Mario? The people who will buy Lego Mario are probably mostly Nintendo fans that love Mario. So we get that instead of a new cool IP.
I just dont get the argument for this.
