KLXVER said:
Darwinianevolution said:
I agree with that to a point. Nintendo needs to convince 3rd parties to make games that they either can't do or refuse to do (they could totaly make a new F-Zero, but are they doing it?). That will have a bigger effect on software and hardware sales. But in the case of Lego, I think it would be different. It's not a matter of manpower and budget anymore, those games are rather cheap and several of them can be released each day, with decent quality. It's because they would be so easy to do (Nintendo would only really need to advise and watch over the project) and would have so many potential benefits, that I'm surprised they haven't done something like this already. There's enough profits to gain and barely any risk, unlike Bayonetta 2, Mario-Rabbids and possibly Bg&E2.
|
Im sure they could make a Mario and Dora The Explorer crossover for cheap as well and kids would love it.
Maybe there should be some risk in the games they decide to bring to the Switch. Otherwise we will just get safe and cheap games only.
|
There should be risks on the games Nintendo makes and funds, but that doesn't mean to just ignore a safe project. Again, it's not like it would take the same time, manpower and efford to make a Nintendo Lego game than the needed to make BotW. It's not a risky project, but rather a small one, that would mostly use 3rd party manpower, Nintendo would just need to allow the 3rd party and fund it.
