By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Final-Fan said:
Lawlight said:
I did not want Hilary to be elected because of:

- The TPP
- I wanted western intervention in the middle-east to stop.

And you felt the policy proposals of Hillary's that you disagreed with, and those of Trump that you agreed with, outweighed the policy proposals of Trump's that you disagreed with, and those of Hillary's that you agreed with?  Would you like to name one or two of each from the categories other than "Hillary disagree"? 

Do you really think President Trump will disentangle us from the Middle East? 

(Wasn't Clinton already against the TPP by the time she became the nominee?  Do you think she was going to support it anyway if she was elected?)

When read with a magnifying glass, they weren't all that different from standard Republican jargon. 

As a whole, I did it since I oppose the antagonizing of Russia, protecting countries who don't contribute to NATO and most importantly, Trump understands the US has no right to preach to other countries when they've never been an example... 

Sweden can preach to everyone because they've been one to almost everyone, same with Norway, but the US has a lot of skeletons in the closet that will make their leadership noxious to some extent until they've atoned for them. 

I am saying this as a foreigner of course, so it has no bearing in any discrepancies that might arise. Stuff that might hurt you might benefit me. 

Regardless, we do need change here.