| trestres said: Ubisoft is a fairly good company, nothing compared to Capcom or Konami, even Assassin's creed got a bunch of low scores. MP3 beats any of those games, specially Halo 3 in terms of a better game, Haze is a D game compared to any good Wii game. The rest I can play them on my PC, well except for resistance, so I really don't care. If it's Haze like support, I repeat enjoy :D |
Erm...
Why are you hating on Ubisoft? What have they done to you? No need to downplay a company because they are not supporting your console of choice.
Assassin's Creed, while not the greatest game on earth is still a very solid (albeit repetitive) game. Tom Clancy's games have never been better. The Splinter Cell Series is on it's fifth iteneration, and still going strong, Rainbow Six has evolved into a great first person shooter, culminating in Rainbow Six Vegas. Ghost Recon has also evolved into a great shooter this generation, and Prince of Persia is one of the most revered game series, and has always gotten high marks for it's games.
I don't understand how Ubisoft is mediocre, or "fairly good". So what they published HAZE. That doesn't say anything about them as a developer, that was publishing. All they did was hand over money to Free Radical to make/market the game. Thhat speaks nothing about their development studios. And if HAZE is the only game that you can bring up that is bad in their library, it speaks volumes about what good a company they are.
Also, HAZE may be a "D" game to you, but 208k people (first week) disagree with you, and bought the game 
\
I think, moreso that Ubisoft struck a nerve with Wii Fanboys when they decided not to put the new Prince of Persia on the Wii, when you guys just got one a few months ago. That may be why your post are somewhat bitter, but you're masking that by downplaying Ubisoft as a company.
EDIT:
Why are you talking about Halo 3? That's from Microsoft Game Studios/Bungie.
