Bandorr said:
I did read it. Shame you couldn't muster up an actual answer though. Then again if I had to play Devils advocate I couldn't either. It is an impossible stance to defend with any logic. There is no "all or nothing" defense for something like this since there are so many different possibilities. Once you start allowing compromises or loopholes then those loop holes and compromises will get "used" by people. Thus leading to the question of "why even restrict this if we allow people to game the system" and then we are back to the beginning again. |
I mentioned a couple of those possibilities and stated that abortion would be acceptable under those circumstances. Not sure what you mean by 'all or nothing'.
