By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nautilus said:
Mummelmann said:

So, let me get this straight; OP cannot possibly use a 3 minute trailer to make his points but you can make an OP predicting 100 million or more lifetime sales based on the exact same info. Explain to me how that works, exactly.

Hey, I never said he cant have a conclusiob out of the teaser or even criticize.Anyone here have the right to do it.But just as he has the right to go on to my thread and say I am insane, that I am wrong and list his reasons, I believe I have the same right.I personally think he is wrong and I wrote it as so.There is no censorship here.

But I personally believe that my prediction was base more on concrete facts that we know or have a better knowledge of.I did mention all the things that still to be confirmed, and did say here and there what I hoped would be in or out, but my main three points were based on things that are already out there, and backed up by facts and data.This thread of his is more based on things we dont even know for sure or outright rumors and taken as a fact.And I personally believe that is much more open for criticism.

So all in all, he can write whatever he wants, but I have the right to say my piece, just as he has the right to say if my opinion is good or bad.

Oh, I'm not saying that you or anyone else aren't entitled to an opinion. What I take issue with in this instance is the fact that you berate the OP for basing his reasoning on only a short presentation video, when you were doing the exact same thing yourself. So these two conclusions/speculations are based on the same material, yet you sounded like his were disqualified due to being based on said video. See the problem here? If you state that OP lacks the information and this the insight to make a proper call, or even a good guess yet, you need to apply the same reasoning to your own thread seeing as how you're both privvy to the exact same information, or rather lack thereof.

That was my main point in my response to you, not whether or not someone is entitled to an opinion.