Volterra_90 said:
potato_hamster said:
I acutally looked up the price of PS3s when the Wii U came out. They were $299.
If you think this console is totally different than WIi U, then we don't really have anything to discuss because that's ridiculous. Moving the processing of the console from the base to the controller does not make it totally different.
Bethesda refused to confirm that Skyrim was coming to Switch. That's a fact. It's currently not known whether Skyrim will ever be playable on Switch.
If Switch is going to have better third party support than Wii U because of sales, why didn't Wii have better third party supprt? The wii sold better than the Switch ever will. Third parties abandoned the Wii U because of catastrophic sales of third party games on the Wii U. Nintendo has had no trouble churning out million + selling Wii U games on that small sales bases, but Third party games sold terribly in comparison. Why was that? Why will this time be different?
|
The main concept they tried to sell with the WiiU was dual screen play. The Switch totally moved away from that. Yeah, it's definitely a quite different concept.
|
this is absolutely absurd to say these consoles are "different concepts". That's like saying that a main feature of the dualshock was vibration, but the six axis has motion controls and no vibration, so the six axis is a totally different controller than the dual shock.