By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Machiavellian said:
Locknuts said:

He would have violated his feduciary responsibility to his shareholders and would have had to explain himself to them.

Save money and make shareholders happy or give more money to the government to push their aggressive foreign policy? Hmmmm....

There are no shareholders but Trump and his family.  His real estate business is run under subchapter S corporation which do not have any shareholders.  Instead all of his business run under his name and their profit and losses goes under his personal taxes.

Oh.....I did not know that. But I'd still prefer keep the money if I could do it legally rather than give it to an aggressive government.