fatslob-:O said:
sundin13 said:
Now as far as the Clinton Foundation is concerned, yes, I believe that potentially making massive sums of money by making personally favorable decisions in foreign policy is significantly more of a threat than people donating to a charitable organization. The Clintons don't make money fromt he Clinton Foundation (including salary http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-09-16/the-clinton-foundation-vs-the-trump-foundation ). Further, the figure you pulled up (85 people) first of all doesn't say anything about whether the access was granted due to donations, and even if it was, that was 87 people out of thousands (AP decided to skew that figure as much as they could) and if you actually read the details of what was found, there was absolutely nothing untoward about any of those meetings. When the biggest hit you can find on the foundation is that she met with a Nobel Peace Prize winner and spoke to someone who was involved with AIDS charity while running an AIDS charity, you ain't got shit.
But yeah, I can see you have no interest in any actual discussion so I think this discussion has run its course.
|
Fine, deny all the evidence you want but the emails are there just to show how the Clinton Foundation donors colluded with the Secretary of State at that time ...
|
Infowars is basically a tabloid site which frequently posts false information and this article posts absolutely nothing in the way of sources. Got any sources that are even mildly trustworthy?
The worst thing that I have seen any solid proof of from this whole debacle is Clinton maybe meeting with donors, and that has already been deemed to be entirely legal.
http://www.newsweek.com/john-dean-why-pay-play-charges-against-clinton-are-bogus-496742
