Ryng on 13 August 2016
| Bandorr said: So you are comparing something only on the wii to something that is on everything BUT the wii. You are comparing something that cost nothing and was bundled with every wii, to something that is fairly cheap(and gets much cheaper) to something that was a full price $60 dollar game. They have no consoles in common. They have no game type in common. They vary wildly in cost. You are basically comparing watermelons, to a banana, to a piece of cake. Aside from being able to eat them - they have little in common. |
1) The comparation was made by Daniel, is not from me.
2) Is fun to see that you guys really don't get what is the sense of those charts, fair or not unfair...
