By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
laopa said:
CaptainExplosion said:

But wasn't that also the case for PlayStation discs?

Yeah, but Sony was more focused on making the console well known and good to develop for. Nintendo was a stablished brand and wanted to factor out any kind of piracy for the console. They had a very different approach.

Cartridge decision had nothing to do with piracy. 

CD-ROM piracy was pretty much unheard of in the early/mid-90s that was never the issue. I remember seeing a CD burner for the first time in like 1996, they were still rare until the later part of the 90s. 

There were various factors, I believe Nintendo had made in the early 90s a large investment in a cartridge factory, and they were reluctant to lose money on that investement. Beyond that developers like Miyamoto didn't like CD-ROM because of loading times. 

Mostly it was likely just arrogance and a lack of vision at the heart of it. Also Miyamoto should've known his place, he's a developer, it should not be his place to dictate company policy and direction. Nintendo could have easily released a N64 with both CD and cartridges, a cartridge slot costs next to nothing if Mario 64 wasn't possible on CD. Never should've been an either/or decision.