Soundwave said:
Is Wii Fit really that much higher in quality than Just Dance? |
Sure, you can argue with that. I'm more into Wii Sports, 2D Mario and Pokémon but I didn't want to ignore Wii Fit. It sold well consistently for like 5 years so I guess it served a purpose for the people who bought it.
Edit: About the chipset comment: They could have gone with a stronger chipset but "The Innovator's Solution" makes it very clear that to compete on new values with a disruptive product you consciously have to make the product "bad" regarding established norms. So in order to get the mass market on board it was neccessary for Nintendo to "gimp" the product and make it less powerful. Otherwise they wouldn't have gotten the mass market. I know this sounds crazy at first but as I mentioned it's been studied across 320,000 businesses across hundreds of industries (and over a timespam of over 50 years) and this held true for every single disruptive product: As soon as the creator tried to make the product "good" for established customers the product bombed (because customers who experience "overshooting" consciously look for a "worse" product to buy and are even willing to pay higher prices for products with fewer features as long as they are easier to use - and yeah it does sound counter-intuitive).
