Ghostbusters Meta critic user score 2.3

[Azuren]

Psychotic said:

Azuren said:

1. So you just want to be "that guy". Enjoy.

 

2. Progressive from the time the original movies came out? Um, yes, yes it is. If it's something and old white Christian will disagree with, it's got a tinge progressive in it. 

 

3. Where are you even going with this? Did you even read any of this? 

 

4. Oh right, no. There's only a very vocal community of people hating the decision and asking why. But feel free to invalidate their existence as long as it furthers your own opinion. 

 

5. It's very simple psychology, dude.

 

And no, no it isn't. What you're describing it a misunderstanding, and it doesn't change the meaning of the message. Feel free to try again, though. 

1) I'm okay with being "that guy", whatever that means.

2) Now you are being "that guy". Here's a story. How do you make it more progressive? Apply shoe polish on some of the characters' faces. For what reason? I don't know, it's just "more progressive" that way.

3) You said there was "no reason" for the gender filp. There's a reason.

4) I don't invalidate their existence, I invalidate their relevance.

5) Yup, a very simple error in human psychology.

I do not need to try again. The point stands. It doesn't matter what you think about yourself, it's up to others to judge your actions.

1. It's a bad thing. 

 

2. That's regressive. Congratulations. 

 

3. Aside from being a gimmick, which I've already pointed out, no.

 

4. You're splitting hairs in a bait-y way. 

 

5. Nnnnnnnnope. Try harder.

 

Yes, you do need to try again. The fact that you don't even see how means you need to either stop and think of just stop.