Nuvendil said:
Oh I wasn't referring to Pachter's numbers which are crazy predictions for a system we haven't seen. I was saying that Zelda is a good centerpiece as centerpieces go and can certainly help the console get off to a very good start, assuming that the surrounding titles for the launch and first year are good. And I suppose what I am trying to get across is that *at launch* - not at any other period, but *at launch* - the consoles a title moves=/=people buying the system for that game. It's about generating excitement and confidence in the platform. More than in any other point in a console's lifecycle, exclusives at launch are tools. Using them correctly via advertising and bundling, they can have an impact disproportionate to their usual sales. |
Oww in that case I agree =]
Yes, Zelda is a good start for the platform and shows promisse. I was talking about expecting that Zelda alone would move 10M NX... for it to move alone it would have to sell much more than 10M on that platform because at least 10M would have to buy because of it and others would buy as a bonus.
I haven't seem any cross game that became alone the must buy of buying the new platform (and in the case of Zelda we were only show the WiiU version, if NX version isn't a lot better than it will be even less of a factor).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







