Einsam_Delphin said:
You didn't acknowledge it either despite quoting it, and you were arguing against my reasoning, so naturally one can assume you disagree with my point. You're the one who replied to me, thus I'm defending what I said, and you are the one who stooped to putting words in my mouth. |
I didn't put anything in your mouth. You're the one who said motion controls were secondary when in most instances they default to "on" and are therefore the primary scheme.








