By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Intrinsic said:
Acevil said:

However that implies Nintendo fans have a large fanbase enough to talk that is equal to Sony's fanbase or Microsoft's Fanbase. So your common sense isn't exactly true either. The three fanbases are not equel in size. The fact that Zelda is being talked about is interesting, because it has caused excitement.  You do not see Pokemon as up there as Zelda. Even E3 coverage places have talked about how well Zelda is being shown. 

I have no idea how that works for you, but you just helped me prove what I mean by common sense is not common. lets see....

40M people talking about 30+ games means that if split evenly you get an average of around 1.1M/game. 

15M people talking about 1 game means yo...... if you don't get it by now never mind.

That isn't true either because those 40 million people can talk about those 30+ games individually thus creating buzz. It isn't 1 for 1 logic here. 1 Person does not equel 1 game. I am not arguing that sony does not have variety, I am arguing fans dismissing Zelda, just because it is the only they had. For example if Half Life was annouced it would most likely be the most talked about thing, and PC has more than all the above. Social media stats is just buzz around products, Zelda has buzz going.

You really need to stop treating this one for one. Humanity does not work that way.