Chazore said:
You would have a point if the game had less content but having 12 maps, 21 characters, 3 modes and a hybrid mode isn't what I call very low content, especially with future content coming in free at no extra price, all other shooters however tend to sport low content and gouge with season passes, OW does not have a season pass. Your best bet would be just sitting and waiting till the price goes down rather than hoping it bombs and Blizz somehow learn a lesson from one guy who thought his wallet would be broken, at a time where most games are sold at much higher prices loaded with ways to gouge more money from you. I paid £45 for the Origins edition on PC, without a discount on GMG, GoG or clients like Steam, some AAA games can go for that price just for their standard editions and go even higher for special ones, Battlefront's Deluxe going for a way higher price comes to mind, and yet people still bought into the super expensive game because it was Star Wars and they thought £80+ was well worth the asking price. |
You seriously call that having a good amount of content? I love Titanfall for example but know that me bying that game (just as when I bought DLC for Mass Effect and Alan Wake) is helping the industry move towards reducing content and putting more expenses on the gamers. So I have decided to not buy DLC for games anymore (well, it was a decision I made in 2010 or something) and will hesitate to buy games like Overwatch even though I think I would like the game very much. Star Wars is a great example since we can compare it to it´s predecessors, all which had massively more content for 60$. Lowering standard is not pushing the industry forward.







