What else could we expect if the magazine is a 'casual' magazine? Taking that into account, 92 is a great score.
Story too complex? Yay! Sounds much better than MGS3 (which was excellent as well but lost to MGS2). Although the story may be complex, I believe it's still not as complex as MGS2's. After all, MGS4 is supposed to explain. And personally I loved MGS2's story. It sucked me into it but I still got time to play. Also, I liked its complexity.
Boss fights? Hard to tell from that kind of a description. Shooting is supposedly pretty simple yet boss fights are too complex and have too much shooting. Guess there's something to it... Well, I guess it's not too bad either.
Not bad, not bad. I would've prefered a better score but it's more of a casual magazine after all. It seems they gave Halo 3 'only' 87.







