By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GoOnKid on 20 May 2016
Edit Thread
midrange said:
KLAMarine said:

You don't need a pvp dimension for a game to be replayable. Speedrunners play hours upon hours of single player games because they like the challenge of aiming for shorter and shorter times. A similar concept applies to gamers who play single-player games aiming for higher and higher scores.

Speed runners are not representative of the majority of gamers. The majority of fighting games are replayed (after the single player stuff is beat) as pvp (couch coop or online). Same for racing titles. You can't say that starfox has "replayability" when the majority of the people who own starfox play it only once.

Otherwise "replayability is an excuse that can be used for any game (say order 1886)

Well, if people really play it only once and never again I can probably understand why they cry about the price. But then again, they would spend another 60 bucks for the next game they play after SF0 and never touch that one again after beating it once. And again with the next one after that. And again after that. I think they spend more in the long run.

As far as I know The Order 1886 consists mostly of cutscenes and walking, belighted by some generic shooting sequences. After you finished it, there is absolutely no value in watching the same custcenes and listening to the same story again.