By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Slimebeast said:
CGI-Quality said:

Getting a lower than 9 score isn't really what people are bothered by. It's the obvious "troll-sense" from a review that grades a game with as low a score as 40%/100%. That should signify a fundamentally broken submission, not a title that has 88 others critically praising it. It's also the fact that that very same site gave it a 100. Which is it? 40% or 100%? That's where the problem(s) stem from.

The issue with your post it the idea that this 40% is a justified "reality-check" to many, many fans who feel the same way that every other reviewer feels. I get the criticism you're receiving. That's all, man.

Justified or not, I'm still hoping for a reality check or wake up call for those two points:

1. Opinions differ

2. Some games ride on their superb visuals and presentation, which tend to mask the quality of the story and other things.

My hope is simply that it got a few people thinking, even if just a little.

There is and should be just one thought when you see a game getting critical acclaim by so many people and sites... and then another site reviews it as being worse than Sonic 06, there is just one reality of what that review stands for and what it hopes to do for their site, it isn't to get people thinking about how deep the world is and how other peoples opinions can be polar opposites to the worlds view btw.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive