By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Slimebeast said:
Kowan said:

It would be so if the review actually carried even a tiny bit of professionalism in it. It's a completely baffling and greatly questionable piece of writing. A "review" article meant not to criticize but to hate. There's a great different between the two.

Yeah, it's questionable, I agree with that. Not a good review. But it still had points that I was happy about,  namely the point that some games unofrtunately often ride on their superb visuals and presentation, which masks the quality of the story and other things. People are wowed by the visuals and perhaps don't evaluate the game as they would have had they not been wowed.

Youre just wrong, stop it, its becoming ridiculous, your arguments are just bad and there are many examples to prove you wrong if youd try to" think just à little bit " ( ryse, the order, crysis 2/3 ),even without thé amazing art/tech thé game is on thé top of thé top of narrative games, thé story telling and acting is great and goes beyond most AAA , even beyond TLOU in term of ambition.

The gameplay is also excellent , so much better than previous U, now very organic and natural, one of thé most thrilling gunfight expérience ever made, and the level design is just awfully good , they achieved to not only get crazy art visuals but also make an addictive level design with thèse visuals.



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m