Slimebeast on 12 May 2016
| BraLoD said: "A Thief’s End” is overflowing with useless detail. It overwhelms the eye with so many different points of focus that one almost clings to the over-the-shoulder focal point at the center of the screen, where the gun reticle can at least hint at a potential ways of engaging with all of the simulated objects and effects that are otherwise impossible to identify, let alone differentiate." The guy is seriously pointing on his review that the game has so much detail it has to be a problem. That it looks so good that he'll take points away from it. That's right from forum users jokes straight to a metacritic "professional" review. Like when he played the "looks too good, 7/10", that actually happened. Seriously, how did Washington Post allowed such a obvious troll article to be posted? The guy is not alone on the click bait issue, Washington Post is to blame just as well. Ridiculous. |
Actually it's written with the same criteria and standards as a typical movie review.
Movie reviews are more demanding, critical and may I say, sophisticated. Gaming journalism is still only in its infancy and it will take a long time before it reaches the same level.
