Areym on 12 May 2016
| Mar1217 said: *Sigh* ... Why are people giving that much importance to Metacritic ?! Seeing people crying because the game has now 93 is ridiculous. It's just a mass of opinions, get over it ! |
It's more the fact that review was satire or something akin to that. The actual review from the washington post is more in line with what others thought of this game, so Metacritic essentially took the score from the "fake"(?) review and took it as an actual score and not the valid one.
Either way, you are right. It's just metacritic, often those reviews do not acquirely reflect how much enjoyment we can get out of a game.
"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian
