AAA300 said:
100 years?!?!? You do realise the Republicans were in control of the house during the balance and surplus of budget during the Clinton years. And the house is what passes the budgets so your wrong about 100 years. And Bush 41 lost to Clinton because he raised taxes. They used his first campaign slogan of " read my lips no new taxes " against him to win. |
All Republican presidents have run monster deficets when given the presidency, it really traces back primarily to Reagan though who popularized the concept of massive tax cuts to millionaires/billionaires as if those people would then magically give a shit about opening an ice cream stand and employing peon middle-class Americans. Since then basically every Republican tax strategy is do the same, which is basically a gaurunteed to balloon debt.
Bill Clinton at least bumped the tax rate up to millionaires/billionaires to 36% or so (Reagan dropped it to 20%, lol).
You cannot cut Social Security or Medicaid, even Republican consituents (read: old people) will lose their damn minds if you do. You can't cut military spending too much or you're a weak leader even though the only wars we fight are against guys wearing pajamas in caves.
So if you're cutting incoming tax revenue you're basically cutting yourself off at the knees.
Hilary Clinton may not be perfect, she may not bring the "oohs" and "ahhhs" that make people feel good like Bernie, she may not be bombastic like a WWE Wrestler like Trump is ... but her tax plan is the only one that has lick of sanity within it. It keeps taxes the same on average/above average income citizens, collects a modest raise on people who make a ton of money, but nothing crazy even there, it's not complete anti-business hostility like Sanders' tax plans are.