By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
Wyrdness said:

Rol you can argue it all you like and tbh I don't care as I thought 2016 but fact is we lost even if it is by default, we got owned plain and simple, I had a stance on why I thought 2016 but the thing is I never took the whole thing as serious as some of you are, if you want to carry on about the topic go argue it with the 2017 mob, if a football team wins with an own goal they still win. It's all in good fun so no need to turn it into something else.

The reason I made the thread was because all of you kept going on about it.

I'm only looking ahead to see Zelda, what the NX is like and the next thread for good fun. As I said anyone who still has a problem check the last part of the previous post.

Something ceases to be good fun when the decision-making process is heavily onesided and plain unfair. I don't see why I should sport a crow avatar after Nintendo's recent announcements while people who were convinced that the Wii U would get more games get a free pass. Even less so when I didn't agree to any sort of bet in the first place.

The entire incident would have been much less of an issue if it had been handled better. Unfortunately, there was a terrible referee who failed at establishing proper rules and employing proper judgment. Like I said in my first response to your Civil War thread after Nintendo's recent announcements, the best option under these circumstances would be to declare no winners. You failed.

He didnt fail. It was a very easy thing to understand. 2016 or 2017. You pick the wrong one and you have to get a crow avatar. Not exactly rocket science.