Hiku said:
KLXVER said:
Many companies would jump on the chance. Capcom still has the final say if they want to accept what they are offered or not.
|
Shares = Capcom. If I own 0.00001% of a company, that's how much my vote would be worth, if I was potentially at a table. And that's the reason those meetings are limited to the majority shareholders whos decisions actually hold weight. If the firm itself happens to have over 50.1% of the shares, they can have the majority ruling in their favor in any situation. We don't know exactly how it is in Nintendo, but whatever the case was with Capcom, the majority of shareholders were open for an outside buy out.
Either way, my point was that there's no reason to not inform major shareholders during shareholder meetings, and that major shareholders have a certain say in things. It generally equates to their amount of shares. And even if the firm itself owns the majority of the shares, that doesn't mean that keeping the others unhappy is always free of consequence.
|
Only way to keep shareholders happy is to make them money. Many of them probably dont even play video games.