Nintendo fires treehouse member Alison Rapp

[Wyrdness]

Hiku said:

You provided one quote, and you added "at times it's unclear what she means", and "give the impression".
How do you then go on to claim that one doesn't need to analyze the thesis in order to understand her viewpoint?
Often times you can't find clarity of someone's stance from a single paragraph because it is written with the assumption that you've read the entierty of it.
I'm not looking at a synopsis over what she wrote. I'm looking at it in addition to it. That person has a better understanding of her thesis than I do, and that's the conclusion he reached.
At some point she "distinguishes between exploiting real-life children and the creation of fictionalized sexual material". And that she supposedly argues for stronger laws against child exploitation seems to contradict the notion that she would support real child pornography. So reading the full thesis may indeed be neccesary to be clear about when she's talking about real life and fiction.

Explain the tweet where she defended the man arrested for possessing real life CP then, I don't see Kotaku mentioning anything about that maybe it has something to do with them having an agenda to start with, even with out the thesis this woman has provided enough ammo that if it were live ammunition her enemies would be able to fight ISIS.