Hiku said:
From what I read, she was for Japan keeping their fictional pornography views as they were. Western pressure on Japan's anti child pornography laws would affect that part as well. She did however want Japan to strengthen their laws against real child pornography. |
Then you didn't read the article linked:
"Criminalising the the possession of a type of media - whether violent video games... controversial political or religious texts, or child pornography - is tantamount to criminalising thought, and should be above countries like the U.S. and Japan who have such strong freedom of speech protections."
Now, she may have 'meant' fictional, but in her thesis as the article states she jumps between fictional and real. And at times it's unclear what she means. But it's certainly statements like the above that give the impression she's not making a distinction between real or fictional.
