By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JRPGfan said:

Graphics still look so damn dated...
I really wish nintendo had done better when it comes to how this game looks.

I know they did a small bit of polishing to get it looking a tiny bit better, but it just not up to par with todays standards.

 

*edit: looked at youtube comments afterwards:

"In so many ways, this looks like a game lost in time; and not in the good way. It's just all so dated looking, from the presentation and graphics to the HUD/GUI elements and beyond. It's like the game hasn't really moved on from the N64 era, as if presentation hasn't evolved in the last 20 years."

"Some weakass textures"

"I wouldn't say Star Fox are back in action. This is around the fifth version of the first game. Not quite the full team either. It's missing the main female character and member of Star Fox team, Krystal."

"Krystal DLC when?"

Oh well you can also buy Ratchet and Clank for $40. That game doesn't appear lost in time in any way. Starfox will be a great game for those who love it. But technically it might not be very impressive  (even for Wii U). As long as the gameplay is tight and there is enough content U am sure the fans are happy. Nintendo is also happy since they could cut on the budget which means bigger profits.



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar