By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
StarOcean said:

I cant. YI has aged much better imo. DKC just looks ugly. Then again I dislike the entire DK series as a whole and dislike the art style with it so that may also cause me to not like it. Its just a very unappealing game for me personally

I quite like the way the DKC games look myself, I like the quirky character designs and rich backgrounds. Different strokes for different folks I guess.

 

 

Nuvendil said:
You know, since all use iterations of the same tech, you could have just had one DK game on there :P.

They vary a bit in aesthetics and implementation though, so it's very possible to prefer the look of one over another.

 

 

Never said:

Star fox has aged surprisingly well despite being early 3d graphics and I think this is because of the use of simple shapes and very few textures. Frame rate is a fault that holds it back though. Frame rate also utterly ruins Stunt Racer FX and makes that game seem unplayable now.

I was going to have Starfox on the poll for its breakthrough 3D rendering, but while I too feel its simple shapes have aged well, most people seem to think it looks too simple.