Well... having watched the vids, several things to point out.
1. There are at least several games missing. If you are going to remove games that you feel they are casual and you barely include others and call that "lenient", then that is an opinion and this is no longer a list a of validation, especially when you call it the Full Retail Release Timeline.
2. Personally I can't take him seriously anymore when on one hand, he was essentially telling people to boycott Splatoon, said he was buying the game used because despite the game being well made by his own testament, he was not willing to give the developers his money because of one feature missing. He then went on to criticize Nintendo fans he disagreed with his stance, because they were boycotting games that were missing features available to users on another platform. He asks why do people hold 3rd parties to a higher standard to Nintendo because they should all be set on the same standard.
If you agree with all that. Fine. That's not the issue. The issue is that not even a year later, SFV comes out and he buys it at launch fully knowing the amount of content, and then proceeds to defend his purchase. One thing he says is that he holds Nintendo to a higher standard than Capcom and for that reason its ok for Capcom to give him, in what was his opinion, crap.
My issues with both themselves games are minimal and I don't find the 2 actually comparable. Shokio is defending his hypocrisy just makes me no longer really care for what he says.
Yes the Wii U was not successful in quantity and support and there's no way around that, but this list shouldn't be seen as fact because factually its not. Its as factual as saying Splatoon is Nintendo's first new IP since Pikmin
3. This BlackB0nd guy just took a clip off Shokio's video, changed the title, and used different music...
Regardless of how I feel about that effort, it just is Shokio's chart so it goes back to point 1 and 2
