RolStoppable said:
SWORDF1SH said:
Lol let's play 'you hate me' card. You are still missing the point and your turning this into something else. I actually have more confidence in reason 1 but not because of you. You had 2 chances to reply to me but you just replied with absolutely nothing.
I asked for link to get the an understanding the context of why they believed consoles would be a threat. Talking to mjk put more context on it. You could of done the same. To tell the truth a simple reply to my first comment would of prevented where we're at. All I wanted is to understand your opinion and as it's your opinion, talking about it is the whole point of a forum.
If you want to sulk over me calling your thread tripe instead of talking about, fine, it only generates the illusion that you do not know what the hell you're talking about.
Anyway thanks to mjk and ruler for doing rols work. Now I usually have a 3 strike rule but you've had more than enough strikes so excuse if I don't reply to next post.
|
What's in the OP isn't my opinion for why Microsoft entered the console business. It's factual.
When others already provided you with additional information while I was offline, then it's redundant for me to post exactly the same things afterwards. You already got what you asked for and at that point you should be man enough to admit that I was right all along. Come on, say it. Rol was right.
|
It really does not matter why MS entered the console business a long time ago because the leadership has changed radically since then. Actually MS as a company has radically changed from that period so trying to look at the pass to determine who MS will run in the future is pretty much a waste of time. Instead you should be looking at the direction of MS today and their future plans to try to understand where the Xbox division will go.
