Each version of Fire Emblem Fates does not have as much content as Awakening.

[tbone51]

Faelco said:

spemanig said:
The logic used here is extremely flawed. Scenario is not being accounted for at all. It doesn't matter if you're experiencing the same map or characters when the scenarios, challenges, and objectives on the map are completely different between versions.

If you're told to kill king poo in birthright in 12 turns or whatever, but in Conquest you have to escort princess pissplease across the map in 5 turns without her getting attacked by an enemy, but in Revalation you have to stall the other side for 8 turns, and the story reason behind all three is completely different, but it all takes place on the same map, they all hold the same value.

 

We can talk about the scenario if you want! It's easy, you need the 3 versions if you want the full story with all infos and the true ending. So story-wise, it's not 3 games but one. And one pretty bad story from what I've read... 

 

But yes, it would be great if this new thing was not supported by the gamers. The overpriced DLCs of Awakening have been accepted, the Amiibo DLCs are accepted, now the games cut in three for more money are accepted... Well, some people can accept anything when it's from Nintendo, and Nintendo knows that. They know thanks to that how to make money without a good-selling console and with less games, good for them. 

It's still 3 full games. You need to buy all 3 metroid prime games and all 3 Uncharted games to Get the full story too right? 

 

Anywayz traditional Fe players are more stoked on actual game than story hence Conquest is going to be amazing. Also as stated the main reason for the split is for the new crowd (awakening) and the old school players.

 

Ironically 2 games together is 60 bucks. (download the other) and has a ton of more content than your average ps4/WiiU/X1 60 dollar game so I don't see the problem. If you want to use that logic that is :p