Teeqoz said:
That first thing sounded like something that would be in a Mediamass "article". (please don't click the link, I don't want to give them ad revenue) They're a site that autogenerates celebtrity "articles", ie. put in a random celebrity name, than slightly changes a few parameters from each article. I'm sure you'll find suspiciously similar investments for other celebrities if you google it. |
That makes sense. Or else the bigger number is due to ascribing the entirety of a business to the celebrity, even if he/she only has a tiny ownership stake or mere endoresement deal with the company. It's certainly a big discrepancy!







