fatslob-:O on 03 February 2016
| vivster said: It's not hard to define when it's most often used without added sexual undertones. Moe is not only defined through looks, half of it is behavior and moe behavior is never sexual. You can find a character moe or sexy, not sexy because of moe and not moe because sexy. If there is a character that is both then it's separated and has nothing to do with each other. Correlation =/= Causation. It's the same fallacy as people thinking that fan service does make bad animes when it's just bad animes that employ the most fanservice. |
Moe isn't defined through anything really when all it boils down to is "adoration for a character" so you don't even need appearance or behaviour if you really want to get arbitrary about it ...
Context matters ...
