| anamme said: If they really want to make changes at who and what is nominated, why not start with the many questionable choices and pity-nominations the Academy has doled out over the years. |
Forrest Gump is great, and perhaps I would say better than PF, but I'm no specialist so I won't discuss it. On the rest I do agree, even though never saw SK movies and several people have bad opinion of him the consensus is that he is genial. But as you put those are a lot more intriguing than no black person being nominated.
| The Fury said: This is turning weird. Lack of diversity? For directors, there are 2 american's, an aussie, irish and a mexican. That's pretty good diversity for an American awards ceremony.... sorry though, that isn't the kind of diversity they are looking for, is it? Yet I don't remember that many great performances from Black actors in the last year. I recently saw Creed, a great film, however lead actor Michael B Jordan was good but not great in it. Sly Stallone was great in it so deserves his nomination. |
Sly is Rocky. No one can interpret Sly being Rocky =p

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







