Captain_Yuri said:
Zekkyou said:
Speaking personally, i think we should have relatively strict rules on avatars being SFW (bar obvious exceptions, like someone having a Bayonetta avatar), but be looser on signatures. That way those that like to express themselves with NSFW-esk stuff can do so (*waves at Captain_Yuri*), and those that don't want to see those signatures can simply turn them off. It's not a perfect solution, but i think both sides giving something up is preferable to one getting everything they want and the other nothing.
It's not like many use their signatures for such things anyway. This thread has over 100 posts, and there's only 1 person with anything NSFW-esk (*waves at Captain_Yuri again*), debatably 2 if we include whatever the heck is going on in Jason's signature :p
In an ideal world it'd be nice to give users more control over what they see in general though. Would be cool if the mods could tag signatures as NSFW, and users could choose weather they wanted to see those tagged signatures or not in their settings. |
*waves back*
Out of curiosity, how acceptable is my current avatar in your scale?
|
I think your avatar needs to be toned down, but i'm personally fine with your signature.
That said, i'm likely on the more accepting end of the discussion. My partner is more likely to be amused by your signature than annoyed, and i don't have an office job or the like, so i'm naturally going to be more tolerant. While i do think it's important that users like yourself retain a degree of your ability to express yourself with stuff like that, it's also important we don't force too many to have to hide stuff. A middle ground would have to be found, though i have no idea where that will be. The mod team will likely discuss everything at some point.
If your signature does end up having to be toned down too though, i hope you and your boob jiggling gifs will forgive us :(
