Is this website actually SFW?

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

VitroBahllee said:

Captain_Yuri said:

Well, what I think is having a more strict website in terms of sigs and avatars makes it less fun. Heck many websites including sites like neogaf have avatars that are just like the ones from vgc if not worse and that site has game devs and etc. The best solution is to have an option to disable avatars and sigs either instead of being more strict. I personally dont think vgc is in nsfw but rather in the gray area since I do access the site from work at times and making it less fun = zzz

To be fair, your 'boobies' signature is ridiculously immature. If you need to post 'boobies' everywhere to 'have fun,' then that's kind of your problem, isn't it?

Immature? Sure but if u are coming to vgc or really any forum to seek "maturity," then u are going to the wrong places... And its not really just "boobies" to "have fun" but rather the environment. Having a relaxed environment generally leads to more users being active and whether u like them or not, many people do love boobies which is why many sites that allow them within reason. Having a site that doesn't allow them, specially for new users results in strict environments. If professional tech sites and many gaming sites can allow boobies while still having a great user base that is way bigger than vgc... Why can't vgc have them?

It has been proven over and over again that having boobies part of an avatar/sig within reason doesn't do a site harm yet we continue have a thread like this every year and bam, it gets restrictive which makes the site more zzz for a lot of people. If it was only me, then I would be the only one in the side of allowing more avatars/sigs like mine but I am not. Also the fact that we have these threads every year also shows that people do indeed want it... Specially if u look at the summer avatars/sig. The best solution as someone already said is to have a button that disables sigs/avatars whether it be on a per user baises or site wide.