Would you be OK with Nintendo killing the Wii U so early?

[bigtakilla]

AEGRO said:

bigtakilla said:

What's your point?That if the Wii U stayed out another year it'd get the 3rd party games you are talking about? Or is your comment a desperate jab at Nintendo fans to try and undervalue what the Wii U has brought this gen.

Doesn't change the fact that Nintendo has some of the best games this gen, and a great lineup of exclusives. Zelda U will also top that list as well. While I'd personally like to see another year with the last games I'd like to see released (Metroid, an actual Animal Crossing game, a home console main line Fire Emblem game, ect), this gen has delivered when including what is still announced.

 

Why would i be desperate? I could buy the Wii U in an instant and my bank account wouldnt notice.

Im just refering to this part of Rol's comment:

"It's simple, really. The Wii U is home to some of the best games of this generation and the system didn't need three years to have a somewhat acceptable library of exclusives."

Like i said, games are games. At the end of the day a Console catalog is judged by the games as a whole, not exclusivities.

If you read my previous comments i said that i would be pissed if i were a Wii U owner because i believe in long generations, it gives time to developers to release their games.

The lack of actual relevance is what came off as desperate. I think anyone on this website of working age and has a job could afford all 3 systems of they wanted them.

That said, the Wii U library is really good and will get stronger this year, and it seems like the exact point of the NX and a unified handheld console/home console is to help the systems game library.

That said I even agree with you to a degree, I think a console gen should be no less than 5 years. If Nintendo IS planning on releasing the NX in year 4 (which I have my doubts it'll release before 2017), they better show a DAMN good reason they did, or I'll be right there with anyone who's pissed off.