.:Dark Prince:. said:
TheRealMafoo said:
sc94597 said:
disolitude said:
This game explains why GTA4 deserved a 10. I'm not saying this is a bad game as i, sure its great but if 2.5 hours of side scrolling gameplay gets you an 8.2 in 2008...GTA4 should be an 11. |
Games are determined by how good they are/$. This game is really good for a $10 dollar game. Now if gta IV was $10 dollars it would deserve a 20 out 10, but it's not. |
Ok, let's use that logic. You get 2.5 hours out of $10. That's $4 an hour. GTA has 100 hours of play, if you do all the side quests, not including the online play. at $4 an hour, that's $400 worth of play for $60. I would still only give it a 10 though ;) |
So every single non-GTA IV game should get a low score because it's not 100 hours?
Can you create a game like DMC4 and make it last 100 hours? Assassin's Creed? Prince of Persia? Every shooter in the market? |
If Ikaruga was 100 hours in length it would no doubt force me to stab out my own eyes.
