Opinion: As earlier NX releases, as bigger are the chances it wont be what your waiting for.

[bdbdbd]

JNK said:

bdbdbd said:

 

And why wouldn't it be new generation and competition to PS5/X2 in 2016?

 

1. to early (people "just" got the 8th gen

2. To small gap in power possible for reasonable price. Even high end pcs didnt have MUCH better graphics as ps4 now (games like order1886 even look better then most ultra pc games)

Ok. I don't get the point you're making. Are you saying people who did't have a 8th gen console wouldn't jump to gen 9 and skip 8, or what was the point? Out of the 70 million people a year later, earlier launch had 20 million potential customers more, that would follow the better graphics on NX, right?

JNK said:

bdbdbd said:

 

It doesn't matter what hardware Wii U had as long as the games were just as bad as they were/are. I don't think this is a matter of 3rd party games, as Wii U did have somewhat moderate 3rd party support right out of the gate, but it dried out because that's what nobody was buying. Multiplatform games hadn't come earlier in any case as they did for the PS4/X1 anyway. 

 

wii u had crap third party support with third party game didnt even looked better as ps3/xbox360 versions = no reason to get wii u.

If ps4 would have same graphics as ps3 it would fail too.

Ps4 btw even had a crappier exclusive lineup as wii u, but still its selling like hotcakes. Because games like Fifa, COD, GTA, Fallout, Witcher, Metal Gear Solid, Batman, Assassins Creed and much, much more are available on ps4 and they all look way better as on ps3

No, it actually had quite a few games available at launch. But if you want to point out that it's the games that count, not the hardware, then yes, you're right.