mZuzek said:
UGH. Don't get me started on this. (You already have, though.) This annoys me so much. Fire Emblem just got 3 newcomers and 1 returning character from Melee in Smash 4, racking up for a total of a whopping SIX characters in Smash. Meanwhile, Zelda, a far bigger and more important franchise, is stuck with the same 5 characters since Brawl, and it's actually the same 5 since Melee (that's 15 years) if you don't count Young Link and Toon Link as different characters, because it's not a big change from one to the other. And even then, 2 of these 5 characters are semi-clones, which is stupid because Ganondorf being a clone of Captain Falcon makes zero sense. I don't really know what it has to take for Zelda to get better representation in Smash, as not only does it have obvious mainstay characters that could come in (Ganon, Impa), but even lots of memorable one-timers like Midna/Wolf Link, Zant, Ghirahim, Tetra, Skull Kid, and so on. And I know their idea is to not focus on one-timers with Zelda, but that doesn't explain why Sheik is still there considering she's a one-game character. |
Oh i dont disagree, i think certain franchises need more representation. For example i like to see Bandana Dee in, but i rather DK franchise get their King K Rool/Dixie b4 my choice, same goes with Zelda franchise.
That said, Ganondorf should remain all the same as he has appeared in 3 SSB games like he is now with each installment making him feel more unique. All we need is Ganon (pig form) with a trident as a newcomer!!!
As for Zelda other characters, i could see SK (he is so damn popular!!!), my favorite Midna, or maybe Impa?
