Mr Puggsly said:
Goodnightmoon said:
Mr Puggsly said:
I think Halo and CoD are designed for competitive play. The bar for Splatoon is lower then what is expected in other shooters.
Who cares if its the most popular shooter in Japan? Is that supposed to mean something?
If you're gonna compare it to Titanfall then I want to see population numbers for Splatoon. Oh right, Nintendo isn't showing that.
I think Halo and CoD are more compettive games. But hey, casual shooters can be fun too. I just role my eyes at these awards. If that offends you... deal with it.
|
You re the one that needs to get over the fact Splatoon has won to 4 of the most profitable and expensive games of the industry. In 2 categories against them. Including XBONE big star, Halo 5. It is not the most popular, not the most profitable, not the most ambitious, not the most expensive, not the most "hardcore", BUT still won. Maybe that's because the game is freaking brilliant and some of you just don't see it or dont want to see it.
And please, are you saying that the population is low because Nintendo isnt showing? my god...That game is plenty of players every hour of every day and the amount of sales never stop as all the charts show. We dont need a number to see the obvious, Splatoon is having WAY more life than Titanfall. In fact people still talks about it, no one talked about Titanfall at the third month.
|
I'm not angry about Splatoon winning those awards, its a joke to me and many other people. But hey, if those awards mean alot to you, enjoy them!
I own Splatoon by the way. Like many people I received my copy free simply for buying a Wii U. Its fun, it really is, but its not an ambitious game. Other shooters would get ripped apart for offering so little. But whatever, these awards are a good laugh.
Even now I could play Titanfall any time of the day and find plenty of people to play with. I've seen Splatoon comparisons to Titanfall in the past. I think people forget Titanfall is nearing 2 years old, still active, and on more relevant platforms with shooters constantly coming.
|
It is ambitious because it's different. That's basically the definition of ambitious. So...that statement doesn't make much sense. If by ambitious you mean "fleshed out", then yeah, I could maybe see where you are coming from.
